Articles on Shifting Sands
Laws against FGM and Khafz need to be scrapped
While I disagree with Dawoodi Bohra’s insisting that a distinction be made between their practice known as ‘khafz’ and what’s generally termed ‘FGM’, I understand, considering how the latter is generally viewed and discussed.
See piece reproduced below for context.
According to the WHO, procedures that intentionally alter or cause injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons are all ‘female genital mutilation’ irrespective of the type or severity.
Khafz is portrayed as a harmless religious ritual which may involve a symbolic nick to the clitoral hood or wiping away a mucous membrane.
‘FGM’, also known as female circumcision or female genital cutting, is an umbrella term for traditional and sometimes harmful cultural practices. It is illegal in many countries worldwide.
But some forms of ‘FGM’ are arguably as harmless as ‘khafz’ is reported to be. And many are less severe than male circumcision, which is legal everywhere.
In Britain even intimate piercings in under 18’s are officially being reported as ‘FGM’. Despite that they are mostly clitoral, labial and vaginal entry piercings, seen predominantly in caucasian teens.
Yet more than 200 girls under 18 had labiaplasty on the NHS in 2015-16. More than 150 were under 15 despite that the NHS recommends it should not be performed on girls under 18. Are we to believe these labial alterations were really medically necessary?
Laws against ‘FGM’ need to be scrapped and states allowed to objectively and independently consider how they address the practice.
The following was published 25 August 2018 by Religious Freedom News and is reproduced here with permission.
An organization representing women of Dawoodi Bohra Muslim community today defended the practice of female circumcision prevalent in the community saying it does not amount to female genital mutilation (FGM), which needs to be banned, Press Trust of India reported.
The organization issued a statement today in the wake of Court of Criminal Appeal in New South Wales in Australia overturning the conviction of three people accused of FGM. The court ruled that the traditional Dawoodi Bohra practice of ‘khafz’ (female circumcision) does not amount to FGM.
Dawoodi Bohra community is a Shia sub-sect of traders hailing predominantly from Gujarat and spread across the world.
The group, Dawoodi Bohra Women’s Association For Religious Freedom (DBWRF), said that khafz was a harmless religious ritual that was being followed for centuries, FGM was unwarranted and it should be abolished.
In a statement issued today, secretary and spokesperson of DBWRF, Samina Kanchwala, said, “Khafz is a completely harmless religious ritual followed for centuries and this historic judgement will be welcomed by Dawoodi Bohras around the world, who are struggling to inform public opinion that is intent on denying women their right to practise their religious observance.”
According to her, khafz was a part of their religious freedom guaranteed by the Constitution and that the procedure does not amount to FGM.
Khafz is a very small procedure and not female genital mutilation, Kanchwala said adding, “But we consider FGM as totally unwarranted and want the end of it.”
“As highly educated and empowered women, we would not indulge in anything that would harm their daughters. Besides, in a democracy everyone deserves their right to practice their religion with freedom,” she said.
Welcoming the Australian court’s judgement, she said, “Appeals bench ruled the trial judge was wrong to direct that Dawoodi Bohras’ practice of khafz was not ritualised or that it involved damaging the clitoris.”
“Among other grounds, the appellants had also argued that a de-minimis cut or nick would not amount to mutilation,” she said.
Quoting the judgement, she further said the court admitted evidence from Professor Grover, a gynaecologist, and Dr Jennifer Smith, a paediatrician and the medical director of the Victorian Forensic Pediatric Medical Service.
“The evidence confirmed that the two girls had not had their clitoris removed or cut and that there was no sign of any scarring or injury,” she said.
A section of Dawoodi Bohra Women have filed a case in the Supreme Court seeking a ban on FGM saying the practice was violation of human rights of children and women.
On July 30, the Supreme Court questioned the prevalent practice of FGM of minor girls in Dawoodi Bohra community, saying the women cannot be “subjugated” to the level, where they have to “please” their husbands only.
A bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra, which was hearing a plea seeking a ban on the practice, also referred to fundamental rights including Article 15 (prohibition of discrimination on grounds like caste, creed and sex) under the Constitution and said a person has the right to “have control over her body”.
About the Author - Guest Author
Offers of relevant material for publication (unpaid) will be considered with interest.
Articles: Grouped by Tag
Recent Tweets by @ShiftingSandFGC
Mutilation is OK - if carried out in the name of transgenderism. shiftingsands.org.uk/is-trans…
Allan J Jacobs @globaldiscourse shows how understanding of the anatomy of female/male bodies can contribute to debates about circumcision: anatomical differences make female circumcision dangerous in infancy and male circumcision safest in infancy. bristoluniversitypressdigital…
In this @globaldiscourse essay, @briandavidearp shows how he and Rick Shweder agree on the presence of double standards but depart in their normative conclusions, with Earp rejecting all medically unnecessary medical cutting of children. bristoluniversitypressdigital…